Hi All,

I was wandering what peopls thoughts were on Serge Gracovetsky's argument that the idea of stability is problomatic and that control of instability would be a more appropriate model. A you tude link provides a recent interview with Gracovetsky highlilights some of his ideas.

[www.youtube.com]

One of Gracovetsky's main arguments is that holding a static stabilised position for lomg periods of time will cause certain tissues to become overloaded. Therefore control maybe the central consideration rather than trying to hold an 'ideal' postural postion.

Cheers

Phillip